Contract Wins Arrive as Cash Flow Strengthens — and the Numbers Matter#
Halliburton’s twin operational headlines — a multi‑year, five‑year well stimulation agreement in the North Sea with ConocoPhillips Skandinavia and a completions and downhole‑monitoring award for the Northern Endurance Partnership (NEP) carbon‑capture project — land against a clear financial backdrop: FY2024 free cash flow of $2.42B and net debt of $5.98B. Those figures frame the company’s ability to fund vessel conversions, scale completions manufacturing and maintain a progressive shareholder return program while pursuing energy‑transition revenues.
Professional Market Analysis Platform
Unlock institutional-grade data with a free Monexa workspace. Upgrade whenever you need the full AI and DCF toolkit—your 7-day Pro trial starts after checkout.
The contracts themselves are strategically complementary. The North Sea stimulation deal consolidates Halliburton’s offshore service footprint and embeds its Octiv/ZEUS IQ digital stimulation stack into a high‑value operating environment; the NEP award converts legacy subsurface capabilities into a recurring monitoring and completions role for large‑scale CCS. Together they illustrate Halliburton’s two‑track strategy: defend and deepen core upstream services while establishing operational credentials in low‑carbon subsurface work.
That strategic signal is amplified by the balance‑sheet and cash‑flow context. At year‑end 2024 Halliburton reported total debt of $8.60B, cash and cash equivalents of $2.62B, and total stockholders’ equity of $10.51B, leaving a net debt of $5.98B and a current ratio of approximately 2.05x — metrics that underpin near‑term flexibility to invest in both digital and physical infrastructure without immediate balance‑sheet strain. These financials are drawn from Halliburton’s FY2024 results and company releases (see FY figures and press releases) Halliburton press release — ConocoPhillips multi-year well stimulation contract (North Sea) Halliburton press release — NEP awards Halliburton contract for CCS monitoring.
Financial performance: revenue stability, cash‑flow momentum, and margin resilience#
Halliburton’s FY2024 top line was essentially flat versus FY2023: revenue of $22.94B in 2024 compared with $23.02B in 2023, a decline of roughly -0.35% year‑over‑year. Gross profit was $4.30B in 2024, yielding a gross margin of 18.75%, while operating income of $3.82B produced an operating margin of 16.66%. Net income was $2.50B, equivalent to a net margin of 10.90%. These calculations come directly from Halliburton’s FY2024 reported income statement figures in the company filings and financial summaries Investing.com — Halliburton financial summary.
Monexa for Analysts
Go deeper on HAL
Open the HAL command center with real-time data, filings, and AI analysis. Upgrade inside Monexa to trigger your 7-day Pro trial whenever you’re ready.
While revenue was effectively flat, cash‑flow improved: net cash provided by operating activities rose to $3.87B in 2024 from $3.46B in 2023 (++11.85%), and free cash flow advanced to $2.42B from $2.08B (++16.35%). The company’s ability to convert earnings into cash improved, driven in part by modest working‑capital dynamics (reported change in working capital of $6MM in 2024) and steady depreciation and amortization of $1.08B. The stronger FCF profile underpins a redistributable cash pool for dividends and buybacks even as capital is allocated to strategic investments and asset conversions.
There is, however, an unevenness beneath the surface. Net income declined from $2.64B in 2023 to $2.50B in 2024 (a fall of approximately -5.30%), reflecting pressure on some operating streams despite margin discipline. Management’s reproduction of digital services and efficiency plays is supporting margins, but cyclical demand variability across basins continues to limit top‑line growth. Q2 2025 commentary and earnings dynamics (revenue of $5.51B in Q2 2025, slightly above consensus; EPS of $0.55 in line with expectations) show ongoing unevenness in demand and reinforce the narrative of cash resilience amid revenue cyclicality Investing.com — Halliburton Q2 2025: strong cash flow supports returns despite EPS miss Investing.com — Earnings call transcript: Halliburton Q2 2025 results.
Income statement snapshot (FY2021–FY2024)#
| Fiscal Year | Revenue (USD) | Gross Profit (USD) | Operating Income (USD) | Net Income (USD) | Gross Margin | Operating Margin | Net Margin |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 22,940,000,000 | 4,300,000,000 | 3,820,000,000 | 2,500,000,000 | 18.75% | 16.66% | 10.90% |
| 2023 | 23,020,000,000 | 4,360,000,000 | 4,080,000,000 | 2,640,000,000 | 18.94% | 17.74% | 11.46% |
| 2022 | 20,300,000,000 | 3,310,000,000 | 2,710,000,000 | 1,570,000,000 | 16.32% | 13.34% | 7.74% |
| 2021 | 15,290,000,000 | 2,020,000,000 | 1,800,000,000 | 1,460,000,000 | 13.18% | 11.77% | 9.53% |
The table underscores margin improvement through 2023 and a small step back in 2024 — a function of revenue mix shifts and cyclical pressure in select markets. Still, the company’s FY2024 margins remain well above FY2021 baselines, reflecting structural operational improvements and pricing discipline in many service lines.
Balance sheet and leverage: manageable net debt, ample liquidity for strategic execution#
Halliburton’s year‑end 2024 balance sheet shows total assets of $25.59B, total liabilities of $15.04B, and total stockholders’ equity of $10.51B. Total debt was $8.60B, with cash and cash equivalents at $2.62B, leaving net debt of $5.98B. Using FY2024 EBITDA of $4.76B, the year‑end net debt / EBITDA metric equates to around 1.26x (5.98 / 4.76), which is materially lower than older leverage peaks earlier in the decade and supports the company’s stated capital‑return targets.
The current ratio (current assets / current liabilities) is approximately 2.05x (12.38 / 6.05), giving Halliburton short‑term liquidity headroom to execute vessel conversions and manufacturing ramp‑ups cited in the North Sea and NEP projects. Long‑term debt of $7.96B is sizable but reasonable against equity and operating cash flow, and management appears focused on keeping leverage in a prudent band while continuing buybacks and dividends.
Balance sheet & cash flow summary (FY2021–FY2024)#
| Fiscal Year | Cash & Equivalents (USD) | Total Assets (USD) | Total Liabilities (USD) | Total Equity (USD) | Total Debt (USD) | Net Debt (USD) | Operating CF (USD) | Free Cash Flow (USD) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 2,620,000,000 | 25,590,000,000 | 15,040,000,000 | 10,510,000,000 | 8,600,000,000 | 5,980,000,000 | 3,870,000,000 | 2,420,000,000 |
| 2023 | 2,260,000,000 | 24,680,000,000 | 15,250,000,000 | 9,390,000,000 | 8,810,000,000 | 6,540,000,000 | 3,460,000,000 | 2,080,000,000 |
| 2022 | 2,350,000,000 | 23,250,000,000 | 15,280,000,000 | 7,950,000,000 | 8,940,000,000 | 6,590,000,000 | 2,240,000,000 | 1,230,000,000 |
| 2021 | 3,040,000,000 | 22,320,000,000 | 15,590,000,000 | 6,710,000,000 | 10,220,000,000 | 7,170,000,000 | 1,910,000,000 | 1,110,000,000 |
This table highlights a steady improvement in free cash flow conversion across the past three years even as absolute debt has trended down from the 2021 peak. The net‑debt/EBITDA improvement is an important enabler of management’s capital‑allocation policy.
Technology, contract economics and competitive dynamics#
Halliburton’s recent wins are not purely incremental revenue; they are also commercialization milestones for its digital and automation stack. The North Sea stimulation award explicitly references Octiv digital fracturing services and modified vessel capability, converting a traditional service engagement into a digital‑enabled, higher‑stickiness delivery model that potentially lifts revenue per job and reduces non‑productive time. Similarly, the NEP CCS contract leverages the company’s completions, reservoir‑characterization and monitoring capabilities to create recurring service streams in an adjacent addressable market.
Competitively, Halliburton is intersecting two vectors. In offshore stimulation and completions, equipment, vessel capability and integrated digital monitoring are differentiators that favor incumbents with scale. In CCS, the company is early but credible: manufacturing completions domestically (Arbroath facility usage), deploying long‑term monitoring, and offering analytics that help operators demonstrate storage integrity to regulators. These moves matter because CCS contracts can create multi‑decade service loops that look more like annuities than the typical upstream project cadence.
Yet competitive risk remains. Rivals that invest aggressively in automation, or new entrants that undercut with lower‑cost manufacturing, could compress contract economics. Halliburton’s advantage rests on its integrated hardware + software model: Octiv/ZEUS IQ coupled with global logistics and vessel assets. Execution — putting systems into production at scale and converting pilot wins into multi‑year recurring flows — will determine whether the technology premium translates to sustained margin expansion.
Capital allocation: dividends, buybacks, and balance‑sheet discipline#
Halliburton has signaled a commitment to returning capital: the company paid quarterly dividends of $0.17 per share in 2024–2025 (most recent declaration dates in 2025) and has increasingly used buybacks to complement cash returns. The fiscal 2024 dividends paid total $600MM with share repurchases of $1.0B, funded out of the company’s free cash flow of $2.42B. Management has publicly targeted returning at least 50% of annual free cash flow to shareholders through dividends and buybacks, a policy supported by 2024 cash generation and consistent with the firm’s payout dynamics DividendInvestor — Halliburton declared dividend.
From a capital‑efficiency lens, the combination of de‑leveraging (net debt declining from peaks), improving free cash flow and targeted returns suggests balanced allocation: maintain investment for differentiated digital and manufacturing capacity while supporting shareholder returns. The mathematics are straightforward: FY2024 free cash flow of $2.42B financed $1.6B of shareholder distributions (dividends + buybacks), leaving retained free cash to fund capex (investments in property, plant & equipment were $1.44B in 2024) and working capital needs.
Key risks and near‑term catalysts#
Halliburton’s opportunities are clear, but so are the principal risks. The largest single risk is cyclical exposure: upstream spending is sensitive to oil‑price moves and operator capex decisions, which can compress activity in key basins and reverberate through Halliburton’s revenue. A second risk is execution — converting pilot CCS and digital automation wins into scale. If CCS commercial roll‑out is slower than the company anticipates, or if integration challenges delay vessel conversions, the near‑term revenue uplift will be smaller than modeled.
On the balance sheet and financial side, interest‑rate moves and refinancing timelines for portions of the debt stack can alter financing costs, but current leverage metrics (net‑debt/EBITDA ~1.26x on FY2024 arithmetic) leave breathing room. Finally, competitive dynamics — particularly if rivals accelerate proprietary automation offerings — could compress pricing or erode share in selected markets.
Near‑term catalysts to monitor include backlog disclosures for the North Sea stimulation program, the commercial timeline for NEP installations, segment‑level revenue and margin cadence across continental basins, and quarterly free cash flow conversion that will determine the size of future buybacks.
Valuation context and market sentiment#
At the time of these figures Halliburton’s share price was $21.28 with a market capitalization of approximately $18.14B and reported EPS around $2.13–$2.16 (TTM), implying a P/E around 9.85–9.99x depending on the source timestamp. Enterprise‑value multiples are also a useful lens: reported EV/EBITDA is about 6.16x (TTM), and forward EV/EBITDA estimates in consensus models show modestly higher multiples as near‑term EBITDA normalizes in some forecasts. These metrics reflect a market view that prices in cyclical risk while recognizing solid cash generation and a meaningful dividend yield in the low‑3% range Investing.com — Halliburton financial summary MarketBeat — Consensus rating: Moderate Buy on Halliburton.
| Valuation Metric | Reported / Calculated |
|---|---|
| Share price (snapshot) | $21.28 |
| Market cap | $18.14B |
| EPS (TTM) | ~$2.16 |
| P/E (TTM) | ~9.85x |
| EV/EBITDA (TTM) | 6.16x |
| Net debt / EBITDA (FY2024 calc) | 1.26x |
| Dividend per share (quarterly) | $0.17 |
| Dividend yield | ~3.2% |
Note on small data divergences: some data feeds list EPS or ratios with slight timing differences (e.g., EPS 2.13 vs 2.16). We prioritize company FY2024 filings and the latest consensus where appropriate and explicitly flag when metrics are TTM versus fiscal‑year arithmetic.
What this means for investors#
Halliburton sits at an inflection of cash generation and strategic repricing of its service mix. The company’s FY2024 cash profile — $2.42B free cash flow and a net‑debt/EBITDA ratio that we calculate at ~1.26x on year‑end figures — provides a runway to execute both traditional offshore stimulation programs and nascent CCS operations without immediate financing stress. The North Sea and NEP awards are operational milestones: one anchors offshore stimulation, the other seeds recurring CCS monitoring revenues.
If management can scale digital platform adoption (Octiv, ZEUS IQ) and turn CCS monitoring into repeatable, long‑duration workstreams, the strategic effect will be to lift long‑term margin carry and reduce revenue cyclicality by layering in annuity‑like services. Conversely, cyclical declines in upstream capex or slower CCS commercialization would keep revenue growth muted and make margin expansion harder to sustain.
For investors, the most relevant signals to watch are quarterly free cash flow conversion, backlog disclosure tied to the North Sea program, and unit economics reported for automation services (pricing, gross margins, and renewal rates). These metrics will demonstrate whether the company’s strategic wins are translating into durable financial improvement or are primarily tactical proofs of concept.
Conclusion#
Halliburton’s recent contract wins are strategically coherent with the firm’s broader pivot: use core subsurface skills and global scale to capture near‑term offshore stimulation revenue while repurposing those same capabilities for CCS and digital monitoring, which can generate recurring revenue streams. That strategic narrative is supported by tangible financial strength: FY2024 free cash flow of $2.42B, a net debt position of $5.98B, and a current ratio above 2x that together create execution flexibility.
The company’s immediate challenge is converting pilot‑scale technology deployments into scaled, margin‑accretive offerings while managing exposure to oil‑services cyclicality. Execution on the North Sea and NEP projects — and the cadence of cash conversion in the next several quarters — will determine whether Halliburton can convert strategic optionality into sustained, higher‑quality earnings.
All financial figures cited are drawn from Halliburton’s FY2024 reported financials and the company’s public releases; operational contract details are from Halliburton press releases and market reporting linked in the article. For updates on Q3/Q4 results and segment disclosures, consult Halliburton’s investor relations releases and quarterlies.