Table 1 summarizes the top‑line and bottom‑line trend across FY2021–FY2024.

Fiscal Year	Revenue (USD)	Net Income (USD)	Gross Margin	Operating Margin	Net Margin
2024	$4,180,000,000	$284,400,000	60.05%	15.95%	6.81%
2023	$3,830,000,000	-$206,200,000	60.40%	3.35%	-5.38%
2022	$3,710,000,000	$266,300,000	62.66%	16.88%	7.18%
2021	$2,960,000,000	$1,390,000,000	65.47%	22.02%	46.97%

The arithmetic is straightforward: FY2024 revenue of $4.18B versus $3.83B in FY2023 implies revenue growth of +9.14% year‑over‑year ((4.18−3.83)/3.83). Net income swung from a loss of -$206.2M in FY2023 to net income of $284.4M in FY2024 — a change of +237.92% (calculated as (284.4 − (−206.2)) / |−206.2|). Gross, operating and net margins for FY2024 compute to 60.05%, 15.95%, and 6.81%, respectively, when dividing the relevant line items by revenue. These margins are consistent with management’s message of revenue quality improvement and operating‑leverage recovery in 2024.

Table 2 shows balance sheet and leverage metrics computed from the FY2024 balance sheet.

Item (FY2024)	Value (USD)	Computed Metric
Cash & Equivalents	$679,500,000
Total Current Assets	$1,800,000,000	Current Ratio = 1.80 / 1.06 = 1.70x
Total Assets	$10,980,000,000
Total Debt	$5,210,000,000	Debt / Equity = 5.21 / 4.22 = +123.37%
Net Debt (Total Debt − Cash)	$4,530,500,000	Net Debt / EBITDA = 4.5305 / 1.2 = 3.78x
Total Stockholders' Equity	$4,220,000,000	Return on Equity (Net Income / Equity) = 284.4 / 4220 = 6.74%

Independent calculation of the current ratio using total current assets of $1.80B and total current liabilities of $1.06B yields 1.70x. Net leverage computed as net debt divided by FY2024 EBITDA (net debt $4.53B / EBITDA $1.20B) equals 3.78x. Enterprise value calculated as market capitalization ($17.35B, from the latest quote) plus net debt ($4.53B) produces EV ≈ $21.88B, which implies an EV/EBITDA of 18.23x using FY2024 EBITDA. These calculations differ from some TTM metrics shown in broker summaries; where there is divergence I flag and explain it below.

Note on data reconciliation: the dataset includes TTM ratios that differ slightly from the fiscal‑year computations above (for example, a reported net debt / EBITDA TTM of 3.36x and an enterprise multiple of 16.3x). Those TTM figures likely use a trailing‑12‑month EBITDA or an alternative market cap snapshot; our FY‑based calculations stick to the reported FY2024 statutory lines for transparency and comparability across the full fiscal year.

Quality of earnings and cash flow vs. reported net income#

Earnings quality improved in FY2024: operating cash flow increased to $832.5M and free cash flow to $516.7M, versus $645.4M and $334.7M in FY2023. Free cash flow margin (free cash flow / revenue) for FY2024 is 12.36% (516.7 / 4,180). The operating cash flow to net income ratio for FY2024 using statutory net income ($284.4M from the income statement) is 832.5 / 284.4 = 2.93x, indicating strong cash conversion in the year. The dataset shows a slightly different net income in the cash flow table (net income = $302.3M) versus the income statement ($284.4M); that discrepancy likely reflects adjustments or presentation differences between consolidated reporting and cash flow footnotes. Where reconciliation matters we relied on the income statement and balance sheet headlines and flagged differences for transparency.

The cash generation profile matters because the business is funding OneTru modernization and targeted product investments largely internally rather than through aggressive buybacks or M&A. Capital expenditures in FY2024 were $315.8M while dividends paid totaled $82.7M — signaling a moderate but sustained shareholder distribution without material capital return that would raise leverage risks.

Growth drivers and the execution math: OneTru, AI and TCS#

Management is positioning TransUnion’s future growth around three interlocking themes: cloud‑native platform modernization (OneTru), AI‑enabled analytics and the scaling of new product revenue streams such as Trusted Call Solutions (TCS). The firm has publicly targeted TCS revenue of roughly $150M in 2025 and a multi‑hundred‑million target (~$250M) by 2028, which is a material incremental revenue pool relative to FY2024 revenue but still modest in absolute contribution to total revenue. Coverage of TCS and OneTru (and the higher‑margin potential they represent) has been broadly reported TechCrunch TCS Growth and Bloomberg OneTru coverage.

From a numbers perspective, management’s guidance lift to 6%–7% organic CC revenue growth for 2025 implies that the company expects a noticeable sequential acceleration from the FY2024 organic baseline of roughly +9.14% yoy at the consolidated level. Analysts’ modeled forward EPS for calendar 2025 in the dataset average $4.157; dividing today’s price of $89.07 by that EPS gives an implied forward PE of 21.42x (89.07 / 4.157). By 2028, with an average analyst EPS estimate of $7.05, the implied multiple compresses to 12.64x (89.07 / 7.0482) — a sensitivity that captures why the market emphasizes execution: the present multiple only looks attractive if the EPS ramp materializes.

Table 3 shows our forward PE calculations using the dataset’s consensus EPS estimates.

Year	Consensus EPS (est)	Price / EPS (Implied PE)
2025 (est)	$4.15702	21.42x
2026 (est)	$4.81974	18.49x
2027 (est)	$5.69753	15.64x
2028 (est)	$7.04820	12.64x

Those implied forward multiples align closely with the dataset’s forward PE schedule and illustrate the degree to which near‑term execution and mid‑cycle growth assumptions compress the premium investors are willing to pay.

Competitive position: still one of the Big Three, but the premium is priced in#

TransUnion sits alongside Experian and Equifax as one of the three global credit bureaus, and the company’s recent organic growth has outpaced both peers in the timeframe referenced (2024 organic revenue growth ~+9.2% per dataset commentary versus Experian and Equifax in the mid‑single digits). Market share in core Consumer Financial Services is reported near ~34.7% in early 2025 — reinforcing a strong competitive position for recurring enterprise risk products Reuters: TransUnion Market Share and Competition (Q1 2025).

That market strength explains investor willingness to ascribe a premium multiple, but it also raises the bar: TransUnion must continue to outgrow peers, expand higher‑margin analytics revenue and capitalize on OneTru efficiencies to justify the premium. The mechanics are clear — faster revenue growth and higher EBITDA margins justify higher EV/EBITDA and PE multiples — but failing to sustain above‑market growth or experiencing margin compression from high‑cost modernization would likely produce a multiple reset.

Valuation tension and what the market is pricing#

At the current price of $89.07 and market capitalization of $17.35B, our FY‑based EV/EBITDA calculation (EV ≈ $21.88B / EBITDA FY2024 $1.20B) yields 18.23x. This is higher than some TTM enterprise multiples in broker summaries (reported EV/EBITDA ≈ 16.3x), which again highlights differences in trailing vs. FY‑only calculations and timing of market cap snapshots. The practical takeaway is that the market is assigning a mid‑teens EV/EBITDA and a forward PE in the low‑20s range to TransUnion’s expected profile — a premium to the broader industry because the company is expected to outpace peers.

This premium sets up the core investment question: does TransUnion have credible pathways (OneTru, TCS, AI analytics) to deliver EPS expansion consistent with the forward multiples embedded in consensus estimates? The company’s FY2024 cash conversion (free cash flow $516.7M) and improved operating margins provide encouraging early evidence, but the balance sheet carries sustained leverage (net debt $4.53B) that requires continued cash generation to meaningfully delever.

Risks and execution watch‑points#

Several measurable risks are worth tracking. First, macro sensitivity: TransUnion’s top customers are lenders, and demand for credit risk analytics is tied to lending volumes and credit cycles. Management explicitly modeled guidance with a conservative macro stance, which helps set expectations but also signals that improved lending activity is not assumed by management as a tailwind. Second, execution on OneTru — large cloud migrations and platform rebuilds typically carry timing and cost variance; delayed launch or higher build costs would pressure margins. Third, the AI/TCS revenue ramp is visible but still a modest share of total revenue; failing to scale these offerings to a material portion of revenue would make sustaining the premium more challenging. Coverage of these execution elements has been detailed in news coverage Reuters AI and TCS Growth.

What this means for investors#

TransUnion’s mid‑2025 trajectory offers two clear messages. First, the company is executing: revenue growth accelerated to +9.14% in FY2024, margins expanded and cash generation strengthened (free cash flow $516.7M). Second, the market is pricing future execution — specifically the successful scale of AI monetization and OneTru efficiencies — into a premium multiple. That premium compresses the margin for error and makes the stock’s forward returns highly contingent on sustained above‑market growth and margin expansion.

Investors should therefore monitor a short list of observable, quantifiable indicators: sequential organic revenue growth in U.S. Financial Services and international verticals, TCS revenue cadence and client wins, OneTru milestone deliveries tied to operating cost improvements, and quarterly cash flow conversion. Positive, consistent outcomes across those metrics will be necessary to justify the current multiple; missed milestones or a sustained macro slowdown would meaningfully widen downside risk.

Key takeaways#

TransUnion’s FY2024 and Q2 2025 results show improving profitability and stronger cash flow generation, underpinned by an accelerating shift to higher‑value B2B analytics. Our independent calculations from FY2024 filings show +9.14% revenue growth, net income improvement of +237.92%, a free cash flow margin of 12.36%, net leverage of ~3.78x, and an EV/EBITDA of ~18.23x using FY2024 figures. Those metrics explain both why the company commands a premium and why execution must be sustained to keep it.

Conclusion — the conditional path forward#

TransUnion is at a clear operational inflection: it has regained revenue momentum and scaled cash generation, and management points to OneTru and AI‑driven product expansion as the drivers of the next leg of earnings growth. The market reaction to Q2 2025 underscores a familiar dynamic for companies trading at a premium — good prints are necessary but not sufficient; durable upside requires demonstrable progress on higher‑margin product wins and structural cost improvements from platform modernization.

From a data perspective, the story is resolvable and trackable. The company’s FY2024 numbers and the mid‑2025 guidance lift create measurable benchmarks — revenue trajectory, TCS ramp, OneTru delivery milestones, margin expansion and cash flow conversion — that will determine whether the market’s premium multiple is justified. Until those items move decidedly in the company’s favor, TransUnion remains a premium growth‑at‑scale story with upside tied directly to execution rather than to a simple re‑rating.

Sources cited in this piece include TransUnion’s FY2024 filings (filling date: 2025‑02‑13) and contemporaneous coverage of Q2 2025 reporting and strategy execution in Reuters and Bloomberg Reuters Q2 2025 Earnings Beat and Raised Guidance, Bloomberg: TransUnion Q2 2025 Earnings Review, reporting on AI/TCS and OneTru progress Reuters AI and TCS Growth (2025) and TechCrunch: TCS Growth. The article reconciles these public reports with the FY figures used for independent metric calculations.