FY2024: Accrual Profit Meets Cash-Flow Stress — the Core Development#
Rocket Companies reported FY2024 revenue of $5.40B, a YoY increase of +34.66%, and a small GAAP net income of $29.37M for the year (FY ended 2024; filing accepted 2025-03-03). At the same time the company generated negative operating cash flow of -$2.63B and finished the year with net debt of $12.7B, up sharply from $8.45B a year earlier. That juxtaposition — modest GAAP profitability versus materially negative operating cash flow financed with incremental liabilities — is the central tension for Rocket going into 2025 (FY2024 Form 10-K, filed 2025-03-03).
Professional Market Analysis Platform
Unlock institutional-grade data with a free Monexa workspace. Upgrade whenever you need the full AI and DCF toolkit—your 7-day Pro trial starts after checkout.
This combination matters because it separates headline profitability from cash-generation quality. The company’s income statement shows improved margin dynamics relative to the prior year, but the cash flow statement and balance sheet reveal financing-driven stability rather than self-funded operating resilience. The rest of this report unpacks those dynamics, quantifies key trends, and connects them to strategic and liquidity implications for stakeholders.
What the financials show: growth, margin, and the cash disconnect#
On a headline basis the business returned to GAAP profitability in 2024 after a small loss in 2023. Revenue rose to $5.40B from $4.01B in 2023 — a YoY rise we calculate at +34.66% ((5.40 - 4.01) / 4.01 = +34.66%). Gross profit of $4.93B implies a gross margin of ~91.15%, and operating income of $668.05M equates to an operating margin of +12.37%. Net margin, however, remained narrow at +0.54% (net income $29.37M divided by revenue) (FY2024 financials, filed 2025-03-03).
Monexa for Analysts
Go deeper on RKT
Open the RKT command center with real-time data, filings, and AI analysis. Upgrade inside Monexa to trigger your 7-day Pro trial whenever you’re ready.
That improvement in accrual margins masks a divergent cash picture. Operating cash flow swung from a positive $110.33M in 2023 to - $2.63B in 2024, a decline we calculate at -2,483.09%. Free cash flow fell from $49.99M in 2023 to - $3.43B in 2024, a drop of -6,962.00% (cash-flow figures per cash flow statement, FY2024). The company covered that cash shortfall with financing: net cash provided by financing activities was $3.28B in 2024 (vs -$623.56M in 2023), implying substantial new borrowing or securitization activity pushed by financing markets.
Two things follow directly from these numbers. First, accrual profitability in 2024 appears to be driven by operating leverage and revenue growth rather than improved cash conversion. Second, the company leaned on external capital markets in 2024 to offset negative cash conversion, increasing leverage materially.
(For transparency: our calculations use the company’s FY2024 income statement, balance sheet and cash flow figures as reported in filings accepted 2025-03-03.)
Table — Income Statement Snapshot (2021–2024)#
| Year | Revenue (USD) | Gross Profit (USD) | Operating Income (USD) | Net Income (USD) | Gross Margin | Operating Margin | Net Margin |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 5,400,000,000 | 4,930,000,000 | 668,050,000 | 29,370,000 | 91.15% | 12.37% | 0.54% |
| 2023 | 4,010,000,000 | 3,650,000,000 | -402,900,000 | -15,510,000 | 91.01% | -10.06% | -0.39% |
| 2022 | 6,000,000,000 | 5,680,000,000 | 741,910,000 | 46,420,000 | 94.67% | 12.36% | 0.77% |
| 2021 | 13,180,000,000 | 12,680,000,000 | 6,180,000,000 | 308,210,000 | 96.27% | 46.94% | 2.34% |
(Income statement figures and margins calculated from the company’s FY statements; filings dated 2022–2025.)
Table — Balance Sheet & Cash-Flow Metrics (selected) and our calculated ratios#
| Metric (Dec 31, 2024) | Reported Value | Calculated Ratio / Comment |
|---|---|---|
| Cash & Cash Equivalents | $1.27B | — |
| Total Current Assets | $2.06B | — |
| Total Current Liabilities | $9.08B | — |
| Current Ratio (calc) | — | 0.23x (2.06 / 9.08) — liquidity below 1.0 suggests reliance on short-term financing lines or securitization programs |
| Total Assets | $24.51B | — |
| Total Debt | $13.98B | — |
| Total Stockholders’ Equity | $702.5M | — |
| Debt-to-Equity (calc) | — | 19.89x (13.98 / 0.7025) — extreme leverage on GAAP equity base |
| Net Debt | $12.7B | — |
| Net Debt / EBITDA (calc, using FY2024 EBITDA $780.97M) | — | 16.27x (12.7 / 0.78097) — high leverage relative to EBITDA |
| Operating Cash Flow | -$2.63B | — |
| Free Cash Flow | -$3.43B | — |
(All balance sheet and cash flow items per FY2024 filings accepted 2025-03-03; ratios calculated by Monexa analysts.)
Discrepancies in vendor TTM ratios and how we prioritize the numbers#
The dataset includes a set of TTM ratios that materially diverge from balance-sheet-based calculations above (for example, a listed currentRatioTTM of 18.43x and a debtToEquityTTM of 2.73x). Those TTM values are implausible when reconciled to the reported December 31, 2024 balance sheet line items: using company-reported total current assets of $2.06B and total current liabilities of $9.08B, the current ratio we calculate is 0.23x, not 18.43x. Similarly, dividing reported total debt $13.98B by reported total stockholders’ equity $702.5M yields debt-to-equity of ~19.9x, not 2.73x.
When the input data conflicts, we prioritize line-item figures from the income statement, balance sheet and cash flow statement (the raw financials) and calculate ratios directly. Those line items are primary, auditable entries; derived TTM or vendor ratios may reflect alternative definitions (e.g., inclusion/exclusion of certain balance-sheet adjustments, off-balance-sheet securitizations, or different equity bases). We flag the inconsistency to readers and present our calculations transparently so investors can see the basis for conclusions.
Implication: the raw financials point to materially higher leverage and weaker near-term liquidity than some secondary ratio fields imply.
The drivers behind the numbers: mortgage economics, financing programs, and the origination cycle#
Rocket’s business is tightly coupled to mortgage origination volumes, secondary-market financing and balance-sheet-backed activities. Revenue growth in 2024 appears driven by higher origination fees and improved margins on mortgage-related services after the 2023 slowdown. The historically high gross margin (above 90%) is a function of how the company recognizes fee revenue and the low cost of recognizing servicing spreads, but gross margin alone is not sufficient to judge cash resilience in a business that depends on securitization and short-term warehouse financing.
The large swing to negative operating cash flow in 2024—coupled with positive financing cash flow—shows Rocket relied on external financing (warehouse lines, securitizations, or new debt) to fund originations and operations. Total debt increased from $9.56B at 2023 year-end to $13.98B at 2024 year-end (+46.25%), and net debt rose from $8.45B to $12.7B (+50.30%). Those moves are consistent with either higher inventory/loan book holdings or a change in the mix/timing of securitizations and syndications.
From an operating standpoint, that implies Rocket’s near-term results are sensitive to credit market access and funding spreads. Under stable credit markets the company can transform pipeline into cash through sale/securitization; under stress, higher funding costs would erode net interest/spread and create margin pressure.
Quality of earnings: accrual profit vs cash generation#
The return to a small GAAP profit in 2024 (versus a small loss in 2023) is notable and was driven by higher revenue and operating leverage. However, quality-of-earnings flags include the large negative operating cash flow and the near-absence of retained equity cushion (total stockholders’ equity $702.5M). The company’s EBITDA for 2024 is $780.97M, which implies a Net Debt / EBITDA of ~16.3x using our calculations — a leverage level that would be considered high for most non-financial firms and risky even for originator/servicer models unless securitization structures are robust.
The cash flow volatility across recent years is striking. Free cash flow swung from $10.72B in 2022 to $49.99M in 2023 and then to - $3.43B in 2024. That sequence reflects large shifts in origination volumes, balance-sheet activity and capital-deployment choices (including a $0 dividend in 2024 and financing inflows in 2024). Those swings underline that reported net income is insufficient to assess operational health without an explicit funding and securitization run-rate model.
Capital allocation and shareholder returns#
Rocket’s dividend history shows occasional payments but not a consistent growth pattern. The company declared and paid a dividend of $0.80 per share in March 2025 (record March 20, 2025; payment April 3, 2025). Dividend yield is listed at ~4.25% in the dataset, but given the small GAAP earnings base and the company’s negative free cash flow in 2024, the sustainability of dividends depends on cash generation recovering and on financing flexibility. In 2024 the company paid no dividends from operating cash flow: the dividend distribution relied on prior liquidity and/or financing proceeds.
Equity repurchases were $0 in 2024. Historically Rocket has used buybacks and dividends in different cycles; given the elevated leverage at year-end 2024, capital allocation appears constrained and weighted toward financing and originations rather than returns.
Forward estimates and analyst expectations#
Analysts’ published estimates in the dataset point to a revenue rebound and normalized profitability over the medium term. Consensus formatted estimates show revenue of $5.72B for 2025 and growth to $8.04B by 2028 with EPS rising to ~$0.99 by 2028 (analyst counts vary by year). Those forward projections are conditional on improved cash conversion and stable funding markets; specifically, the model requires originations and securitization activity to convert to cash without further reliance on incremental debt.
Table — Select analyst estimates (formatted)
| Year | Estimated Revenue (USD) | Estimated EPS |
|---|---|---|
| 2024 (consensus) | $4.54B | $0.21009 |
| 2025 (consensus) | $5.72B | $0.21564 |
| 2026 (consensus) | $7.94B | $0.67534 |
| 2027 (consensus) | $9.12B | $1.00173 |
| 2028 (consensus) | $8.04B | $0.99 |
(Estimates per dataset; number of contributing analysts shown in original estimates metadata.)
Competitive and market-context considerations#
Rocket operates at the intersection of mortgage origination, mortgage servicing, and consumer finance. Its competitive set includes bank mortgage originators, fintech platforms, and broker-channel aggregators. Two structural advantages show up in the financials: a high recognized gross margin on fee products and an ability to scale revenue through origination platforms. But those advantages are offset by structural funding sensitivity: originators that rely on warehouse facilities, securitizations and wholesale funding channels are exposed to short-term rate and liquidity cycles.
In the current environment, where interest-rate expectations and secondary-market spreads remain important, Rocket’s ability to convert originations into cash without enlarging leverage is a core competitive test. If the company can demonstrate stable securitization execution and maintain servicing economics, revenue growth will matter; if funding markets tighten, leverage could expand further and pressure net interest margins.
Risks and near-term catalysts#
The immediate risks are liquidity and funding-sensitive. Specifically, (1) changes in warehouse financing availability or cost could increase funding expense or reduce origination volume; (2) an adverse credit cycle could widen repurchase or indemnification costs on sold loans; and (3) persistent negative operating cash flow would pressure the already modest equity base.
Near-term catalysts that would materially alter the picture are: (a) a sustained improvement in operating cash conversion (operating cash flow turning positive without reliance on financing); (b) demonstrable securitization/warehouse execution that reduces balance-sheet holdings; and (c) a materially larger retained-earnings build that increases equity and reduces leverage ratios.
What this means for investors#
Rocket’s FY2024 results create a binary story. On the accrual basis, the company returned to GAAP profitability driven by revenue growth and operating leverage. On a cash basis, 2024 was a year of financing dependency: negative operating cash flow, large financing inflows, and sharply higher net debt. For stakeholders this means the near-term investment story is less about margin expansion and more about funding execution and balance-sheet management.
If Rocket can convert originations into cash through predictable securitization and reduce reliance on incremental debt, the accrual profit trend could translate into durable cash generation and a healthier balance sheet. Conversely, if funding costs rise or securitization windows tighten, the company’s high leverage on a small equity base would amplify downside.
Operational watch-points include quarter-to-quarter changes in operating cash flow, the composition of total liabilities (short-term warehouse vs term debt), and servicing performance metrics that affect long-term economics. Capital-allocation watch-points include any shift back to share repurchases or higher dividends if cash generation normalizes; at present the company’s 2024 cash profile suggests those moves are secondary to funding stability.
Key takeaways#
• Rocket reported FY2024 revenue $5.40B (+34.66%) and a slim GAAP profit of $29.37M while producing operating cash flow of -$2.63B and net debt of $12.7B (FY2024 filing, accepted 2025-03-03). These numbers create tension between reported profitability and cash-generation quality.
• Our calculated current ratio is ~0.23x (current assets $2.06B / current liabilities $9.08B) and debt-to-equity is ~19.9x (total debt $13.98B / equity $702.5M), both indicating considerable balance-sheet leverage when using reported line items. These calculations differ materially from some vendor TTM ratios in the dataset; we rely on primary financial statement line items for transparency.
• Operating cash flow and free cash flow swung deeply negative in 2024, and the company relied on $3.28B of financing cash flow to bridge funding needs. This pattern implies sensitivity to funding markets and securitization execution.
• Analysts in the dataset expect revenue to recover to ~$5.72B in 2025 and to increase through 2027–28; those forecasts assume improved cash conversion and stable financing conditions.
• The principal near-term risk is funding: further deterioration in funding availability or a widening of funding spreads would pressure earnings and require additional leverage or equity infusion.
Conclusion — the actionable lens (without recommendations)#
2024 shows Rocket at an inflection: the company earned a small GAAP profit on a clearly improved revenue base, but cash generation deteriorated and leverage climbed materially. The investible question is whether Rocket can convert the accrual earnings momentum into sustainable operating cash flow and rebuild the equity buffer. That outcome depends principally on the company’s ability to execute predictable securitizations and maintain financing access at reasonable spreads.
For stakeholders, the near-term monitoring list is straightforward and data-driven: quarterly operating cash flow, changes in warehouse/short-term financing lines, securitization pace (loans sold vs loans held), and any management commentary on funding costs and debt maturities. These are the variables that will determine whether the FY2024 accrual profit becomes durable cash-based profitability or remains a paper improvement financed by leverage.
(Reported figures cited above are taken from Rocket Companies’ FY2024 financial statements filed and accepted March 3, 2025. Forward-looking analyst estimates referenced are from the dataset of consensus estimates included with the company data.)