10 min read

Jack Henry & Associates (JKHY): Q4 Beat, Strong FCF, Mid‑Single‑Digit Growth

by monexa-ai

JKHY reported FY2025 revenue of **$2.34B** and GAAP EPS of **$1.75** in Q4, with **free cash flow $588.15M** and net-debt negative — growth remains durable but moderating.

Jack Henry earnings beat with cloud and payments growth, MeridianLink partnership, investor outlook on premium valuation

Jack Henry earnings beat with cloud and payments growth, MeridianLink partnership, investor outlook on premium valuation

Q4 FY2025: A Clean Beat — Revenue Up, EPS Leverage, Cash Flow Jump#

Jack Henry & Associates ([JKHY]) closed FY2025 with GAAP revenue of $615.4M in Q4 and consolidated FY revenue of $2.34B, while Q4 GAAP EPS came in at $1.75 (+26.40%), beating consensus estimates and driving headlines during the late-August filing cycle. The market reacted unevenly; the stock quoted $161.75 (-2.30%) at the time of this dataset snapshot, reflecting investor calibration between the beat and management’s more measured FY2026 guidance (AInvest; Nasdaq.

Professional Market Analysis Platform

Make informed decisions with institutional-grade data. Track what Congress, whales, and top investors are buying.

AI Equity Research
Whale Tracking
Congress Trades
Analyst Estimates
15,000+
Monthly Investors
No Card
Required
Instant
Access

Behind the headline: FY2025 net income rose to $455.75M, a +19.38% year-over-year increase versus FY2024, while free cash flow surged to $588.15M, up +75.25% year-over-year. The company produced operating cash flow of $641.50M, which yields a free-cash-flow conversion of roughly 129% of GAAP net income — a material signal of earnings quality and cash-generation strength in FY2025 (AInvest.

These outcomes are the single most important development for investors: Jack Henry is translating recurring, cloud-anchored revenue into high-quality cash flow even as revenue growth moderates to a mid-single-digit cadence at the consolidated level.

Financial performance: What the numbers say (FY2022–FY2025)#

To ground the narrative, the table below compiles Jack Henry’s last four fiscal years from the company’s FY2025 filing and accompanying summaries. I recalculated YoY changes and margins from the raw line items provided.

Income statement (FY2022–FY2025)

Year Revenue (MM) Gross Profit (MM) Operating Income (MM) Net Income (MM) Gross Margin Operating Margin Net Margin
2025 2,340 980.94 535.11 455.75 41.90% 22.85% 19.48%
2024 2,220 916.07 489.39 381.82 41.35% 22.09% 17.19%
2023 2,080 858.64 480.69 366.65 41.33% 23.14% 17.62%
2022 1,940 814.27 474.62 362.92 41.91% 24.43% 18.68%

Key takeaways from the income-statement trend: revenue grew to $2.34B in FY2025 (++5.41% YoY by my calculation), operating margins remained robust at ~22.85%, and net margin expanded to ~19.48% as the business continued to benefit from services mix and operating leverage. The revenue growth figure computed here differs slightly from a packaged growth metric in the dataset (+5.68%); that discrepancy is minor and likely due to rounding or differing period definitions — I prioritize the raw line items in the FY2025 filing when calculating rates.

Balance sheet and cash flow snapshot (FY2022–FY2025)

Year Cash (MM) Total Assets (MM) Total Liabilities (MM) Total Equity (MM) Net Debt (MM) Free Cash Flow (MM) Dividends Paid (MM)
2025 101.95 3,040 ~910* 2,130 -101.95 588.15 164.64
2024 38.28 2,920 1,080 1,840 171.32 335.62 155.88
2023 12.24 2,770 1,170 1,610 262.76 174.57 147.24
2022 48.79 2,460 1,070 1,380 66.28 313.24 139.07

*Notes: The FY2025 dataset included inconsistent line items (it reported totalCurrentLiabilities $949.41M and totalLiabilities $363.37M). That inconsistency violates accounting identities (assets = liabilities + equity). I therefore calculated total liabilities for FY2025 as totalAssets minus totalStockholdersEquity = $3,040M - $2,130M = ~$910M, which aligns with the reported current liabilities and the company’s reduced long-term debt position. Where dataset values conflict, I prioritize balance-sheet algebra derived from assets and equity and note the inconsistency explicitly.

Two points stand out from the balance-sheet and cash-flow view. First, Jack Henry materially reduced net leverage in FY2025: long-term debt fell to $0 on the face of the FY2025 sheet, leaving the company with net cash of $101.95M. Second, management continued to return cash — dividends paid of $164.64M and share repurchases of $35.05M in FY2025 — while still investing aggressively in operations (noted below).

What drove the Q4/FY2025 beat: cloud, payments and services#

Jack Henry’s beat in Q4 and solid FY results are best explained by three revenue dynamics: cloud migration/hosting, payments/transaction volumes, and steady Services & Support.

Cloud-hosted revenue accelerated: management reported double-digit quarterly cloud growth and roughly +11% for the full fiscal year, driven by migration and hosted data-processing volume gains (AInvest. Payment-related revenues showed healthy expansion as transaction volumes rose and the company layered value-added services. Services & Support — the company’s stable recurring base — continued to grow and provided predictable cash flow and margin support.

The segment mix produced operating leverage in Q4: higher-margin services and payments expansion amplified EPS performance, which is why Q4 GAAP EPS rose +26.40% YoY even as consolidated revenue expansion was mid-single-digit.

Investment posture: capex, infrastructure and reinvestment#

While headline margins held, FY2025 shows elevated investing activity tied to cloud and hosting scale-up. The company reported investments in property, plant and equipment and capital expenditures that were larger than recent history (investments in PPE recorded around $231.17M and capital expenditures line items noted). Net cash used in investing activities rose accordingly, consistent with the firm’s buildout of hosted infrastructure and migration programs.

Those investments carried two consequences. First, they compress near-term margin expansion: management guided to a pause in operating-margin expansion for FY2026 as incremental R&D, hosting, and go-to-market investments are prioritized. Second, they aim to raise lifetime-value per client through greater stickiness and expanded payments functionality — a tradeoff visible in the improved cash conversion profile and strong free-cash-flow generation in FY2025.

Capital allocation: dividends, buybacks and debt paydown#

Jack Henry’s capital allocation in FY2025 shows a conservative, shareholder-friendly posture. Dividends paid of $164.64M equal roughly 36.12% of FY2025 net income — consistent with the dataset payout ratio of ~36.13%. Share repurchases were smaller at $35.05M but continue to demonstrate buyback activity alongside a growing dividend stream. Importantly, the firm reduced gross debt to zero in FY2025, shifting the balance sheet to a net-cash position, improving financial flexibility for either continued investment or future returns of capital.

Valuation context and forward expectations#

At the time of this dataset snapshot, market data shows a share price of $161.75, market capitalization of $11.78B, and a TTM P/E of 25.92x. Enterprise-value multiples are elevated but not extreme: EV/EBITDA around 14.57x (TTM) in the dataset, with forward EV/EBITDA trending lower across 2025–2028 as consensus projects modest earnings growth and higher EBITDA over time (Multiples.vc; CompaniesMarketCap.

Analyst-modelled forward growth in the dataset implies revenue CAGR in the mid-single digits and EPS CAGR in the low-double digits (e.g., projected EPS ~$7.58 by FY2028 in a consensus estimate). Management’s FY2026 guidance — which narrows growth to mid-single-digits and signals a pause in margin expansion — is the fulcrum for valuation: the market is effectively paying a premium for durable recurring revenue, strong cash conversion and payment-hosting optionality rather than for rapid top-line acceleration.

Competitive position and strategic partnerships#

Jack Henry’s moat remains its deep integration with community and regional banks, a diversified recurring-revenue base, and growing cloud-hosted services that increase switching costs. The company’s reseller relationship with MeridianLink (highlighted by management) expands its distribution for digital origination and accelerates product bundling without large incremental capex. That partnership is a strategic lever to shorten sales cycles and increase cross-sell potential, adding to the durability of the revenue base while preserving capital efficiency.

Competitively, Jack Henry sits between larger, lower-growth incumbents (Fiserv, FIS) and higher-growth, single-product SaaS challengers (e.g., Q2). Its middle position supports a moderate premium for stability and embedded bank relationships but also limits upside if growth fails to reaccelerate.

Data integrity notes — where the dataset conflicted and how I resolved it#

Two notable inconsistencies required reconciliation. The FY2025 balance-sheet extract contained a clear inconsistency: total current liabilities were reported as $949.41M while total liabilities were listed as $363.37M, which cannot both be true given total assets of $3.04B and equity of $2.13B. I resolved this by applying the accounting identity (assets = liabilities + equity) and calculated FY2025 total liabilities as ~$910M. Where packaged datasets conflict internally, algebraic reconciliation with assets and equity provides the most reliable pathway; I flagged the inconsistency explicitly in the balance-sheet table above.

A secondary small divergence is the packaged revenue-growth percentage (+5.68%) vs. my line-item calculation (+5.41%). That difference is minor and likely reflects rounding or slight period-definition variance; I use the raw line items as primary inputs for growth-rate calculations.

Key risks and what could derail the story#

Jack Henry’s upside is tied to three execution-sensitive items: continued cloud-hosting migration, payments monetization, and effective partner monetization (e.g., MeridianLink). Primary risks include slower-than-expected client migrations to hosted platforms, intensified pricing pressure in payments that compresses take rates, and macro weakness among community banks that could reduce transaction volumes or delay conversions.

Operationally, execution risk exists in scaling hosting infrastructure without mismanaging costs; capital intensity should be monitored relative to realized revenue gains from migrated customers. Finally, the market’s willingness to maintain Jack Henry’s multiple depends on the company proving that current investments translate into sustained revenue acceleration — absent that, multiple compression is a credible risk.

What This Means For Investors#

Jack Henry’s FY2025 results crystallize a clear investment narrative: the company is a slower‑growing, high-quality fintech with a durable recurring-revenue base, improving cash conversion and an intentional reinvestment program to scale cloud hosting and payments. The most important implications are threefold.

First, cash generation is real and substantial. Free cash flow of $588.15M and operating cash flow of $641.50M in FY2025 show the business converts earnings to cash efficiently — free-cash-flow margin was ~25.14% for FY2025 by my calculation. That cash generation underpins dividends, targeted buybacks and strategic reinvestment while maintaining balance-sheet flexibility.

Second, growth is durable but moderating. Consolidated revenue growth is mid-single-digit on the latest fiscal year; cloud and payments remain the fastest-growing subcomponents, but the company is moving from a margin-expansion story into a product-/market-investment phase. Investors should therefore expect top-line-driven upside rather than margin-driven multiple expansion in the near term.

Third, valuation is anchored to execution. Jack Henry trades with a premium that reflects recurring revenue quality and cash flow but not runaway growth. The market will reward visible reacceleration in cloud adoption or a material step-up in payments volume. Conversely, any slip in cloud migration or a durable compression in payment take rates would make the current multiple harder to justify.

Key takeaways#

Jack Henry’s FY2025 creates a pragmatic equity story: the company beat and widened cash-flow strength, paid down debt, and returned capital even while investing to expand its hosted and payments franchises. The balance sheet is healthier, free cash flow is notably large relative to earnings, and valuation sits at a premium appropriate for a stable, cash-rich fintech. The near-term outlook is about execution: turning capex and R&D into measurable, sustainable revenue acceleration in cloud and payments.

Investors watching [JKHY] should focus on three measurable indicators in coming quarters: cloud-hosted revenue growth (quarterly cadence), payment-processing volume and take-rate trends, and the progression of operating margins as reinvestment works through the P&L. Those metrics will determine whether the company earns multiple expansion or whether the market discounts growth and re-rates the business.

Sources#

Specific financials and FY2025 outcomes referenced above are drawn from the company’s FY2025 filing and contemporary coverage of the results (AInvest; Zacks; Nasdaq. Valuation multiples and comparables are sourced from market multiple databases in the dataset (Multiples.vc; CompaniesMarketCap.

Campbell Soup (CPB) Q4 earnings and FY26 outlook, inflation resilience, strong snacks division, dividend appeal, investor ins

Campbell Soup (CPB): Leverage, Dividends and the Snacks Turnaround

Campbell ended the year with **$7.43B net debt** after a **$2.61B acquisition**, while FY results showed **net income down -33.92%** — a capital-allocation and execution test heading into FY26.

Eastman Chemical growth strategy with Q2 earnings miss, China expansion for Naia yarn, sustainable textiles, market headwinds

Eastman Chemical (EMN): Q2 Miss, China Naia™ Push, and the Cash-Flow Balancing Act

EMN missed Q2 EPS by -7.51% and announced a China Naia™ JV; free cash flow improved +27.17% while net debt remains ~**$4.18B**, leaving a mixed risk/reward trade-off.

Akamai Q2 earnings beat vs security growth slowdown and rising cloud costs, investor risk-reward analysis in a balanced市场上下文

Akamai (AKAM): Q2 Beat, Costly Cloud Pivot and the Numbers That Matter

Akamai posted a Q2 beat — **$1.043B revenue** and **$1.73 non‑GAAP EPS** — but heavy capex and a slowing security growth profile make the cloud pivot a high‑stakes execution test.

JLL AI strategy with Prism AI driving efficiency, cost reduction, and stock growth in commercial real estate, outperforming竞争

JLL: AI-Led Margin Lift and FY2024 Financial Review

JLL reported **FY2024 revenue $23.43B (+12.87%)** and **net income $546.8M (+142.59%)** as Prism AI and outsourcing strength drive margin improvement and cash flow recovery.

DaVita cyber attack cost analysis: 2.7M patient data breach, Q2 earnings impact, debt and share buyback strategy for DVAstock

DaVita Inc. (DVA): Q2 Beat Masked by $13.5M Cyber Cost and Balance-Sheet Strain

DaVita reported a Q2 beat but disclosed **$13.5M** in direct cyber costs and an estimated **$40–$50M** revenue hit; leverage and buybacks now reshape risk dynamics.

Regency Centers Southern California acquisition analysis: earnings impact, dividend growth, financial health, grocery-anchorn

Regency Centers Corporation: Balance-Sheet Strength, $357M SoCal Buy, and FFO Momentum

Regency reported **FY2024 revenue of $1.45B (+9.85% YoY)**, completed a **$357M Orange County acquisition**, and shows FCF and EBITDA expansion amid leverage that remains elevated but manageable.